CO2 Unchanged

All around LEONARDO 4 (and previous 2014)
alhashem90
Posts: 48
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2019 1:26 pm

CO2 Unchanged

Postby alhashem90 » Mon Aug 19, 2019 9:02 pm

Hi,
I have placed CO2 of 400PPM in background concentration with other pollutants.
But in Leonardo all pollutants had different dispersion across my model while CO2 looked constant with the same 400PPM across the whole model !!
I have tried to search it or read about physical reasons, but I did not reach an explanation of why it would be stable even when placing different vegetation across the model.
Thanks

Tim
Posts: 757
Joined: Mon May 15, 2017 3:46 pm

Re: CO2 Unchanged

Postby Tim » Tue Aug 20, 2019 8:34 am

Hi,

It should definitely change within the model if you the model area features plants. Could you attach some screenshots?

Best regards,
Tim

alhashem90
Posts: 48
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2019 1:26 pm

Re: CO2 Unchanged

Postby alhashem90 » Tue Oct 01, 2019 12:44 pm

HI Tim,
I have attached pictures for the Basic case with no greens at all, living wall with percentage of 50% of all facades and 50% trees of all areas.
The living wall did not change CO2 at all, while the 50% trees have slightly decreased the CO2 emission in some areas at human level which is not logical as well to find around 15mg/m3 decrease only out of 763mg/m3 !?
Similar findings happened for Particulate matters (PPM) as well but I did not attach pictures, so is there an explanation for it as well?
Thanks
Attachments
Basic - No green.PNG
50% trees .JPG
50% - Living wall.JPG

Tim
Posts: 757
Joined: Mon May 15, 2017 3:46 pm

Re: CO2 Unchanged

Postby Tim » Tue Oct 01, 2019 1:40 pm

Hi,

I'd say the CO² reduction caused by the trees looks fine.
Greening on facades do not yet reduce CO² amount as far as I can see that.

Best regards,
Tim

enviadmin
Site Admin
Posts: 1578
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 11:00 pm
Location: Essen/ Germany
Contact:

Re: CO2 Unchanged

Postby enviadmin » Tue Oct 01, 2019 2:49 pm

The living wall plant are a system of itself and - so far- do not interact with the CO2
Michael

alhashem90
Posts: 48
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2019 1:26 pm

Re: CO2 Unchanged

Postby alhashem90 » Tue Oct 15, 2019 8:20 pm

Hi Prof Bruse and Tim,
I wonder if there is an explanation of why would CO2 concentration would increase from 410ppm in background concentrations which I have placed before running simulations.
But after checking results within different alternatives I have found that CO2 increased to be 420-422ppm in average within different green systems alternatives?
Attachments
CO2.JPG
CO2 - 2.JPG
CO2 - 2.JPG (35.1 KiB) Viewed 13 times

Tim
Posts: 757
Joined: Mon May 15, 2017 3:46 pm

Re: CO2 Unchanged

Postby Tim » Wed Oct 16, 2019 8:20 am

Hi,

I think that I do not understand what you analyzed and how you simulated it. What did you alter? The CO2 background concentration? The plants? How are they modified?
Changing the year does not affect the CO2 background concentration.

Best regards,
Tim

alhashem90
Posts: 48
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2019 1:26 pm

Re: CO2 Unchanged

Postby alhashem90 » Wed Oct 16, 2019 1:09 pm

HI Tim,
- I have run different greenery alternatives ( trees, living facade (LF), etc) with different percentages (0% Basic case, 25% green and 50% green) to see how they would reflect on CO2 ppm in the environment for year 2050 and year 2080 which is hotter.
- CO2 ppm concentration is 410ppm.

I have noticed that:
1- CO2 ppm concentration increased in total to reach 422ppm by 2050 and decreased to be 420 by 2080 ( is there any reason that they change with years/ more heat stress and temperature ?)
2- CO2 ppm concentration increased within human levels more than background concentration in the whole model which was 410ppm.

Thanks

Tim
Posts: 757
Joined: Mon May 15, 2017 3:46 pm

Re: CO2 Unchanged

Postby Tim » Wed Oct 16, 2019 1:31 pm

Hi,

Maybe I would check the stomata resistance. Because of more heat stress, plants cannot open their stomatas during longer periods of the day which could also affect the photosynthesis rates and thus CO2 concentrations. You will have to analyze all aspects of the plant modelling in ENVI-met and compare it with other research findings. I cannot help you analyze that in detail.

Best regards,
Tim

enviadmin
Site Admin
Posts: 1578
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 11:00 pm
Location: Essen/ Germany
Contact:

Re: CO2 Unchanged

Postby enviadmin » Thu Oct 17, 2019 8:27 am

About what time of day are you talking?

Greenery reduces CO2 during the day, but increases it during the night.
In total, the plants are neither a sink nor a source of CO2 in ENVI-met as they do not grow (convert CO2 to their biomass)

Michael


Return to “LEONARDO 4”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest